|
|
|
|
|
by CogitoCogito
1120 days ago
|
|
> How fast can you spin up a dozen VMs? A message bus? A scalable database with read replicas? An entire redundant data center in another region? A few terabytes of storage? A redis cluster? An ElasticSearch cluster? A CDN? A few load balancers? The procurement process to get an extra server provision in a colo will by definition be slower than my deploying a CloudFormation stack. Your examples here are just examples of situations where you basically need a cloud solution by definition. If these are your requirements, then yes obviously you should use cloud for it. That said, your points are a bit confusing. It's not an either-or. For situations like you're describing, you use cloud. For situations where you don't need to use cloud, you can consider something else like on-prem or colo or ... You seem to have a (literally) extremist position where it's all cloud or nothing. It's not. |
|
I literally just gave examples where a colo or on prem makes complete sense - anytime that managing infrastructure is a competitive advantage.
If you have a static workload and your company has the competencies to manage infrastructure, go for on prem.
I’m the last person to recommend someone move to any cloud provider just to treat it like a colo.