Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by simondotau 1115 days ago
Tesla are not holding a gun to any manufacturer's head here. What attracts automakers to NACS is the ability to offer their customers Tesla's existing Supercharger network. Fine. Compatibility with that existing network means ensuring that the socket on the vehicle is within reach of cables on existing stalls.

If they only want compatibility with V4 superchargers, they can stick with CCS1 and let their customers connect through the integrated adaptor.
2 comments
Robotbeat 1115 days ago
Not only that, but the NACS port is smaller, the overall experience is better, and it’s probably cheaper to make, too. Aptera embraced it as well, in part because their smaller vehicle really benefits from the compact design.
link
clouddrover 1115 days ago
The practical reality is charging with other EV brands on Tesla chargers is already happening regardless of where the charge port is:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Y33AArvMUQ

Don't worry about it.

link
simondotau 1115 days ago
I assure you I'm not worried about it. I'm not expressing a concern. I'm making an observation about what will obviously happen. Any automaker interested in adopting NACS is going to make sure their vehicle works seamlessly with existing superchargers. If that means moving the charge port from left to right (or right to left) then of course they will do it. It's not a big deal.
link