[georgieporgie]

Way too many parenthetical blocks, and it seems to jump around a lot. Frankly, it reads a bit like an amphetamine-powered 48th hour rant. I think you were arguing for the consumption of masses of information, but the style of this post pretty much proved the opposite to me.

[chegra84]

2pac work ethics http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spqz-PDCp80

In maths, the people who write the proof sometimes aren't the people who make it rigorous. The elements of the proof are there and there are people who like coming in and fixing it. Same thing with grammar/writing...There are people who like coming in and fixing it.

Diverge then converge, I do stay a little on the diverge side. http://creatingminds.org/principles/div_conv.htm

Or if you would like, it is part of the art form to stay raw.

PS. No amphetamine were consumed during, or before this post or even ever.

[georgieporgie]

Look, I'm just not interested in deciphering your ramblings. It's a TL;DR world, and your points are buried. Take it or leave it.

[mtrimpe]

Hey, behave. The article was pretty good. Fast-paced but I liked it. Only the last three or so paragraphs dropped below the quality standard I'd like to read.

[georgieporgie]

Behave yourself. I gave feedback on a poorly written essay. He responded with an even more poorly written response. Don't try to be condescending to people simply because you disagree with their opinion.