|
|
|
|
|
by ianbicking
1120 days ago
|
|
I feel like there's an implication here that the research should be in modeling architectures and training sets and other specialized machine learning. But there is research here: in natural language modeling of goals, plans, thoughts, processes, etc. Obviously we don't know what paths will be most successful. But a path where critical drivers of AI (like goals) are modeled in a transparent and comprehensible manner seems like a very attractive direction to take. I'd much rather be able to read my AI agents goals, plans, intermediate goals, self-analysis, etc., than have it all captured in a set of completely incomprehensible weights. |
|