Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by duskwuff 5229 days ago
For historical reasons (viz. NSS), Mozilla maintains its own list of trusted CAs. Chrome uses whatever is provided by the OS, so they aren't in a position to make the same sorts of demands.

Not that I disagree with the sentiment -- there's just a very specific reason why Mozilla is involved, and it's not simply because they write a web browser.

1 comments

Chrome could still maintain a blacklist of roots.
One was written after the DigiNotar incident: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=94673