[DiogenesKynikos]

> Ukraine is shooting them down just fine using decades old technology.

It is not publicly known whether this is true.

The Ukrainians claim they shot down 6 of 6 Kinzhal missiles over Kiev in one night with a Patriot battery. In the available videos of the event, all that can be seen is that a few dozen air defense missiles were fired, and that something got through and struck the general location where the air defense battery was.

A very healthy dose of skepticism is warranted about claims made in wartime by interested parties.

[fauxpause_]

Russia arresting the Kinzhal developers for treason (read: failure) tells you all you need to know.

Note also that they purposefully forbid videos of air defenses to avoid showing where air defenses are.

At least one Kinzhal was confirmed shot down earlier before the wave of 6 or so.

[DiogenesKynikos]

Another view would say that the explosion in the video, where the air-defense battery appeared to be, demonstrates that the claim about all Kinzhals being intercepted was not truthful. The initial claim was that the Patriot battery was undamaged, but later it was admitted that the battery was at least partially damaged. It seems that the full truth is not being told, possibly by both sides.

> Note also that they purposefully forbid videos of air defenses to avoid showing where air defenses are.

This has not prevented videos from leaking, as in this case.

> At least one Kinzhal was confirmed shot down earlier before the wave of 6 or so.

Independently confirmed, or claimed? This gets to my initial point, that one should be extremely skeptical about unverifiable claims made by both sides.

[ceejayoz]

> Another view would say that the explosion in the video, where the air-defense battery appeared to be, demonstrates that the claim about all Kinzhals being intercepted was not truthful.

This doesn't conclusively demonstrate that; an intercepted missile or drone can still easily go kaboom when the pieces hit the ground. The footage has a building between the explosion and the camera.

> Independently confirmed, or claimed?

There's at least photos of an apparently-downed Khinzal. There are no photos yet of a destroyed Patriot.

[the_af]

> There's at least photos of an apparently-downed Khinzal

Doesn't look much like anything one of us could recognize though. We are not experts.

More importantly, even if it is a downed Khinzal, it doesn't matter for the article, which is about hypersonic maneuverable weapons, which the Khinzal is not. So the initial post in this thread is wrong.

[ceejayoz]

> Doesn't look much like anything one of us could recognize though. We are not experts.

Articles about it cite said experts analyzing the photos.

[the_af]

Experts on every side say all kinds of things. At times of war, one should be very skeptical.

It pays for Ukraine to claim they are easily downing Khinzals and minimizing their own casualties/hits. I don't blame them for this, misinformation and demoralizing the enemy is key. The Russians are doing the same on their side. Both apply military secrecy and censorship on their own camps.

"Expert" opinion shouldn't be taken as non-biased here, either.

[Animatronio]

>There's at least photos of an apparently-downed Khinzal. There are no photos yet of a destroyed Patriot. That doesn't prove anything, obviously the Ukr govt would supress all pics of damaged/destroyed Patriot systems while heavily promoting intercepted Khinzals.

[dralley]

The ground explosions were caused by Kalibr cruise missiles targeting the airport terminal nearby to where it appears (from satellite imagery) that the Patriots were stationed. It's perfectly possible that A) all Kinzhal's were indeed intercepted and B) the Patriot battery was indirectly damaged by a nearby explosion but was not even necessarily the target of the missile in question.

It can be very difficult for radars to track objects coming in from a high angle of attack and low angle of attack simultaneously, so IMO the failure to intercept makes more sense from that perspective as well.

[fauxpause_]

Shrug. The Kremlin loudly arresting the Kinzhal developers for treason after the Kinzhals get shot down suggests a clear narrative to me about who is telling the truth.

The best case you can make for Russia is that the Kinzhal developers actually did commit treason but in a way that was unrelated to the Kinzhal missiles not being effective which is… laughable

[the_af]

Ukraine is also arresting people who film AA incidents, so who cares.

The governments of both countries are being "selective" about the truth and imposing censorship by force. Which makes sense at times of war!

Nobody here should take anything released by the involved parties (and their sponsors) as gospel. It's war. War is about deception.

[fauxpause_]

The problem with filming AA deployments is not about hiding the efficacy of AA deployments. It’s about hiding their locations.

What is the purpose of arresting your missile scientists for treason? What’s your best case interpretation?

[the_af]

> The problem with filming AA deployments is not about hiding the efficacy of AA deployments.

The problem is both, and Ukraine is arresting people who film them. It's martial law, both countries are at war and truth suffers (understandably).

> What is the purpose of arresting your missile scientists for treason? What’s your best case interpretation?

I don't know, I would guess:

- They said something about the Khinzal that downplays the importance of the weapon.

- They said something that would help Ukraine better counter them.

- They said something against Putin or the military invasion.

What they very likely didn't say is that the Khinzal is a hypersonic maneuverable weapon, which is the point of TFA you're commenting about.