| > That midjourney et al are also detectable to the naked eye. Again, either too slow, requiring outrageous hardware, or obviously noticeable. So far no examples to the contrary. Don't forget, the topic is using special measures to detect undetectable with naked eye. When you can simply see the screwed up hands on a photo it's not even necessary. > Why do you need to watermark them, again? Why do you think I need to watermark them again? > a mid-range video card and a PC to put it in, a space to put the PC in, etc. With a laptop we're back in wait for an hour to see a result. > hardware doesn't get better and 2. techniques don't improve to run them on limited hardware We can revisit this if it consumer hardware gets good enough... |
Any laptop within the last five years with decent memory can run stable diffusion on the cpu in around 12 minutes. My MacBook Pro runs a batch of four on Metal in around 30 seconds.
>We can revisit this if it consumer hardware gets good enough...
I mean, I just showed you a quantized llama running on a Pixel 5 and 6. And, I wouldn't discount most of the next generation of hardware having ML co processing like MacBooks and iPhones and Pixels do with all of this hype.