[mattdesl]

As a thought experiment: if USD were to fail, yet other world currencies stayed afloat, why would anybody holding non-custodial crypto flock to a dying currency? It’s not entirely unreasonable to predict that “crypto” might outlast a central currency, given the ease at which it can span geographic and state borders.

[Analemma_]

> if USD were to fail, yet other world currencies stayed afloat,

This "thought experiment" amounts to "suppose I'm right; then I'd be right wouldn't I? Checkmate."

The entire question here hinges on whether there could be scenario where the USD— and only the USD— collapses, without causing so much chaos that cryptocurrencies also become functionally useless. I would argue there is no such plausible scenario.

[mattdesl]

Sure, if the entire world economy collapses and we go back to the dark ages, crypto (and the internet in general) will be functionally useless. It seems like a given.

I am imagining a scenario where USD fails, but some other state currencies (and the internet) continue to exist.

[smcl]

The assumptions here are:

1. USD fails

2. All the other currencies are "dying"

3. (let's say) Monero exists and is not dying

So yes in the scenario you've constructed where everything but a cryptocurrency dies or is dying, crypto is more successful.

[mattdesl]

You misread - the scenario is that USD is dying, but other state currencies like Euro or JPY stay afloat.

[smcl]

Ok then in that case everyone flocks to the other reserve currencies for all normal goods and services and crypto remains the primary means of exchange on the Ape JPEG market

[hef19898]

Unless crypto is backed actual economies, as fiat currency is, that will propably not happen anytime soon.