Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by orlp 1116 days ago
> OpenAI has no leverage (e.g. terminating service).

Uhh... the United States Justice system? Prior art is morally nice but ultimately meaningless unless a judge agrees with you, which can cost a lot of money before you get there, if you get there.
1 comments
verdverm 1116 days ago
OpenAI has to get a trademark first, they do not own the rights to GPT right now
link
matemp 1113 days ago
"ChatGPT" is a distinctive brand name for OpenAI's particular chatbot system that is based on GPT technology.

However, "GPT" itself is a type of technology (albeit one that was invented by OpenAI). It involves much more than just ChatGPT...even if we just look at OpenAI's own other offerings (e.g. GPT-1, GPT-2, Dall-E, etc.).

The "GP" (generative pretraining) has been a concept in machine learning for many years. The "T" (transformer architecture) was invented in 2017. Thus, the issue for the USPTO will be whether or not combining the "GP" with the "T" is too descriptive or even inherently generic to be "distinctive" to OpenAI.

Sometimes, general terms can become trademarks, by becoming "distinctive" to one company. Microsoft was able to do it with "Windows" (in the field of software, of course). And "booking.com" was able to trademark the word "booking" (for reservation services) in certain contexts. The issue will be whether OpenAI can successfully make the case that they've achieved something similar for the term "GPT" itself. I really remain doubtful of that, given the term's frequent usage as being a type of LLM and a general framework for generative AI.

All that said, I suppose we'll all know for sure soon enough...when the USPTO decides.

link
sharemywin 1116 days ago
https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4809:ho...

Dec 2022

link
ToValueFunfetti 1116 days ago
They applied in December but it has not gone through yet and may not resolve in either direction until September.
link
sharemywin 1116 days ago
It says Active. What does that mean?
link
ToValueFunfetti 1116 days ago
Your link doesn't go through for me, but this page[1] says

>LIVE/APPLICATION/Under Examination

>The trademark application has been accepted by the Office (has met the minimum filing requirements) and that this application has been assigned to an examiner.

Which, apart from some grammatical confusion, is pretty clear. It looks like they have GPT-3, but GPT, ChatGPT, and GPT-4 are all still pending.

https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=97733259&caseType=SERIAL_...

link