|
|
|
|
|
by skybrian
1118 days ago
|
|
You don't have to do it this way, but it looks like the code to be interpreted is normally compiled to bytecode stored in a constant in a C header. So it's all in flash anyway, and you'd update the flash the same way as changing C code. If you're going to do that, why not generate C and skip the interpreter? Is it because bytecode is more compact than native code? I guess there would still need to be a runtime to handle array memory garbage collection. |
|