|
|
|
|
|
|
by tsimionescu
1120 days ago
|
|
|
The more likely scenario is that Russia would rather detonate a nuke in Ukraine than lose the war, regardless of what NATO's response would be. Having Ukraine become an official NATO base of operations is that dangerous to Russia, especially if it happens after they were just conclusively beaten in a war. It would obviously soon mean NATO support for separatists in Russian states directly, and the end of the federation. |
|
|
I really hope that nuke works and that not one person in that command chain has reservations about ending the country he lives in existence in its entirety.
Make no mistake, detonating a nuke will not only bring a response from NATO, it would bring a response from the world. Russia is done for if they do that.
> Having Ukraine become an official NATO base of operations is that dangerous to Russia, especially if it happens after they were just conclusively beaten in a war. It would obviously soon mean NATO support for separatists in Russian states directly, and the end of the federation.
How is having Ukraine become a NATO member anymore dangerous then Finland?, who literally just joined NATO.