|
|
|
|
|
|
by lolinder
1126 days ago
|
|
|
That's entirely due to the sector you're in. That 20-30 person company may be small, but it's attached to a massive external bureaucracy. They don't need to invent their own red tape, and all other companies are playing with the same handicap. In a different sector, 20-30 people is the stage where you should be capitalizing on how much faster you can move than the large bureaucratic incumbent, and if there's red tape that takes weeks to navigate it means someone in the company put it there. |
|
|
I am aware of that; I like it that way. I like long term stability and large bags of money without stress.
The capitalising and ‘faster’ and hurry and stress you speak off is nice if you want bankrupt-or-unicorn. We don’t need to be market leader or whatever; we need to have stability decade after decade and we do. I like profit of millions$/year and small teams, not some breakneck VC funded fast growing all-or-bust stuff. Each their own of course.