[stock-throwaway]

Do you think this is common knowledge though?

I'm pretty sure all YC companies have limited transferability clauses now.

And with the rise of IPO-scale private fundraising, it's possible that a company can remain private literally forever.

This changes the calculus for a young person considering joining early at a startup and I'm not sure that is a good thing for the startup ecosystem.

[BaseballPhysics]

Honestly, I know the horse is waaay out of the barn for you, but anyone considering laying out 100k+ on an asset should consult a lawyer and/or an accountant and just assume they don't know shit.

You don't need "common knowledge". You just need to know enough to know you don't know and need to consult folks who do.

> And with the rise of IPO-scale private fundraising, it's possible that a company can remain private literally forever.

Disagree.

Investors always want an exit. They don't put cash in out of the goodness of their hearts.

Yes they're willing to wait a lot longer and put up a lot more cash, but ultimately they're looking for their 10x, and that means an IPO or acquisition.

That said, speaking for myself, it was over ten years from founding to exit. So yeah, you gotta be prepared to wait a while if you opt for equity over base pay.

[stock-throwaway]

Investors don't have transfer restrictions on preferred shares!!

Only employees have transfer restrictions because they have common shares.

Investors can sell on secondary markets whenever they want, and for the company in question -- they are!

[BaseballPhysics]

And for smaller preferred equity holders (e.g. founders, angels, etc) yeah, they have that option.

I may be wrong, but to my knowledge any significant investor isn't getting liquidity through those private markets. That's all done through traditional bespoke financial transactions. In fact, that's literally what an acquisition is.