|
|
|
|
|
|
by Someone
1120 days ago
|
|
|
> They have known for a long time […] if you have full AGI then it can do human level text completion and if you have human level text completion then it can do full AGI. Do you have a reference for that? To me, that looks quite a jump from what I think we know: that we don’t even know how to define AGI. Text completion, to me, also seems simpler than AGI, as the latter requires the ability to form completely novel ideas. |
|
|