[ineedausername]

I'm in my thirties. I might fall into the category of having trouble recognizing revolutionary technology as you say.

> They all are looking at this and saying this is gonna be huge.

It's beyond me why would anyone assume an LLM that's already been trained in most relevant and available data will just keep becoming somehow way better and smarter. I get that it has it's uses, but what do they mean by huge anyway, theoretically it could end up a huge mess too.

[bredren]

> an LLM that's already been trained in most relevant and available data

Source? Are you referring to gpt 4?

What about private data sets / corporate IP?

What about my private data, such message and email history, contacts’ available or privately shareable data, my photo and video library, and health data?

Presuming all of this was included in an LLM directly or as some kind of additional LORAs.

It seems clear to me that the tooling and resource requirements prevent anything near full accessibility of the content that is there.