|
|
|
|
|
by zmnd
1120 days ago
|
|
I think the main reason for division is that everyone projects to their own use cases. I have been using gpt-4 for quite some time and also couldn't understand why someone would say that it just produces something that sounds like a real answer. But then I found some queries that can definitely be described as "sounding like truth". So your personal experience probably wasn't what was their experience. For those curious, I was asking gpt-4 about the top 3 cards from my favorite board game, Spirit Island. All three of them sounded really convincing, having the same structure and the same writing style, but unfortunately none of them existed. So everything that fails outside of most common use cases would probably have an experience of convincing hallucinations. |
|
ChatGPT is forced to given an answer. It's like a human on "truth serum". The drugs don't stop you lying, they just lower inhibitions so you blab more without realising it.
The more obscure the topic, the more likely the hallucination. If you ask it about common card games, it gives very good answers.
If you asked a random human about 3 cards from a random board game at gunpoint and said: "Talk, now, or you get shot", they'll just start spouting gibberish too.
PS: I asked GPT 4 about that game, and it prefixed every answer with some variant of "I'm not sure about this answer", or it completely refused to answer, stating that it did not know about any specific cards.