[ShamelessC]

The signal to noise ratio in this comment is pretty low haha. The only relevant information here is

a.) the headline - "Snowflake in Talks to Buy Search Startup Neeva in AI Push" b.) that you're not sure how reputable the site is.

Instead, you have included several details about how you were reading some other article, leading you to think they are reputable. Then reading (the same? another?) article about a colleague of yours (okay?) where you found a (relevant?) article on that site. You link it, but don't summarize or even paste the headline and go on to discuss _yet another_ organization cited _in_ the article?

I'm sorry - not trying to be rude. It's just very jarring to me when people write in this manner where they are explaining everything _but_ the important parts.

[mrtranscendence]

If we’re talking about signal to noise, comments that do nothing but critique prose don’t help matters. But if it’s that important to you to be a bit rude to someone you think doesn’t write well, be my guest.

[ShamelessC]

Mostly my intent to clear confusion for other users. Certainly not making any judgements, there’s a variety of reasons one would write this way and the link referenced is indeed useful (you just wouldn’t know it until you clicked on it).