|
|
|
|
|
by s1artibartfast
1123 days ago
|
|
I do think that third worlders have better mental health than first worlders with respect to depression. Different people respond in wildly different ways to hardship and trauma. The difference in outcome between two people is internal, not circumstance. It is impossible that it could be otherwise when you some people have experienced the worst the world has to offer and are relatively happy, while some others have experienced the best and are suicidal. Furthermore, know that the same people can be depressed or happy despite the same material external circumstances, depending on their outlook. Depression especially hinges on mental perspective, perspective, and conditioning. It stands to reason that this could vary culturally and geographically for many reasons. It would be absolutely unethical, but I think you could raise two sets of children to be more depressed or happy with the same material quality of life. Raise one group telling them they are helpless, worthless, and that the world is a terrible place. Tell them that you will give them riches and always disappoint them. Take the other and teach them to have low expectations but enjoy simple pleasures. Equip them with cognitive tools to deal with the challenges of life and disappointment in healthy ways. Do you think you would see a difference between the two groups? |
|
> enjoy simple pleasures. Equip them with cognitive tools to deal with the challenges of life and disappointment in healthy ways
is this really fully teachable? Is it something that truly can be trained or it depends on a very complicated number of external and internal factors, including genetics?
as far as this part: > teach them to have low expectations
Sounds kind of simplistic to say that, but there is always this worry that having low expectations leads to McDonald's, where you may realize that no you actually expected much more out of life, but by that point it's kind of too late and pretty hard to dig yourself out.