Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sorenbs 5233 days ago
As it stands today a Chrome user is no more valuable to Google than an IE user (well, apart from google being default search provider). But any web user today is more valuable than a web user 3 years ago because the browsers deliver a much better experience now, causing the user to spend more time on the web. Chrome played a major part in this development.
3 comments
nilsbunger 5233 days ago
A chrome user is more valuable to google than another browser user:

google paid 1 billion dollars for a search deal to Mozilla with ~30% mkt share. If google had never built chrome, Mozilla share might be 50% or more today. The search deal would've been commensurately more expensive.

The point is, google doesn't have to pay for search engine placement for a chrome user.

link
georgemcbay 5233 days ago
"As it stands today a Chrome user is no more valuable to Google than an IE user (well, apart from google being default search provider)"

I'm not sure your caveat is needed -- on a new installation the first thing Chrome does is ask you what search provider you want to use, you're just as free to pick Bing as Google.

link
mistercow 5233 days ago
Chrome does this, but IE does not. That alone means that a much higher proportion of Chrome users will use Google than IE users. Then factor in the relative name recognition for the two search engines...
link
mistercow 5233 days ago
> (well, apart from google being default search provider)

That's a rather significant difference, you know.

But control over a given user's browser has incredible potential value for Google. Controlling both client and server means that you no longer have to sacrifice performance in the name of standards compliance (so long as you have a standards-compliant fallback mode for other browsers). What that means if you're Google is that a visitor using Chrome can 1) cost you fewer resources, and 2) walk away with a smoother, more satisfying experience.

Does Google currently take much advantage of this potential? I can't say for sure. But we are talking about a company that omits the </html> on its homepage in the name of performance.

link