[TeMPOraL]

> Humans (a GI) have zero ability to do language modeling.

But perhaps they have a component that has this ability.

I maintain that LLMs are best compared not to the entire human mind/intelligence, but rather to the "inner voice" - that bit that sits between conscious and unconscious, having a part on each site, and uses natural language as an interface to the conscious side.

I.e. imagine someone hooked up electrodes to your brain and was able to eavesdrop on the thoughts that you consciously notice, and which are expressed in natural language. If they had the device print those thoughts out as it "hears" them, I think the output - and changes to it in response to what's going on in and around you - would quite resemble the way LLMs respond to prompts.