[throwaway290]

> They could have also made a complete fake as well instead of a partial fake just by keeping the plastic enclosure, this device isn't exactly complicated.

In case of this device, sure. But it would be much more costly and error-prone, build your own PCBs etc. But in case of iPhone we don't worry about them building fakes from scratch, because those would be easy to tell on the spot. We worry about a genuine phone with fake parts.

> That's kind of a ridiculous threat model anyway, those targeted attacks are just going to hack the iPhone and stream the camera in software whenever they want with some custom payload.

As it is now these phones are not so easy to hack without user proactively installing malware and many of them would survive only until the next OS update or security response payload. A hardware attack is more compelling.

[realusername]

> But in case of iPhone we don't worry about them building fakes from scratch, because those would be easy to tell on the spot.

I suggest having a look to Youtube. Some fake iPhones are so good that unless you have a deep knowledge of the product, you can be fooled. I certainly would be fooled.

> As it is now these phones are not so easy to hack without user proactively installing malware and many of them would survive only until the next OS update or security response payload. A hardware attack is more compelling.

I'm confident those state actors have the payloads ready whenever they want to use it on high value targets, this is kind of naive. Pegasus NSO could be a public example of that.

You are not valuable enough to require such an exploit but that's a thing right now.

[throwaway290]

I have never seen such a fake and I don't think they are common or even exist, care to link?

And regarding "payloads", yes but again it's an arms race and it goes away at the next security response. Hardware gives foothold