Dude, your argument against it was 1) that a technology that has been public for six months isn't perfect
2) that smart people would just know that comments were not being made by humans.
I truly don't understand how you are interpreting this conversation.
> I truly don't understand how you are interpreting this conversation.
That makes sense, because you're pretty badly misunderstanding me (which your summary makes perfectly clear).
I mean, 1 was part of a direct answer to your own question "how do you know that you are talking to an actual human right now and not a GPT powered hackernews bot." Emphasis mine. Your 2 is just a total misunderstanding. Hint: I was talking about social knowledge, not "smart people just knowing" in any particular case.
I didn't hand-wave it away, I just labeled it correctly and addressed it.
A mind-blowing trump card of an "argument" it wasn't.