|
|
|
|
|
|
by CapstanRoller
1130 days ago
|
|
|
>socialism for the rich There's no such thing. You're describing an aspect of capitalism (the part where capitalists benefit). "Socialism" does not mean "benefitting from wealth redistribution". By that logic, someone like Genghis Khan could be considered the ultimate 'socialist' because he pillaged more than anyone and redistributed all that wealth to himself. |
|
|