[STM32F030R8]

Since when? It may not be a good argument but should we be deplatforming people over it? Go to Reddit front page right now and try to find something that isn’t a poorly argued political post. What’s the difference? Just because you may disagree with someone it doesn’t mean they NEED to be silenced.

[stonogo]

Politics is about how you think things should be run. Science is about what we have evidence for. They are not the same thing.

[ipaddr]

Science is about coming up with a hypnosis or theory and testing it.

The evidence comes at the end not before the theory

[stonogo]

We generally don't employ hypnosis. Sometimes we even skip the hypothesis step, because "what the hell is that" is enough to start generating data. Don't confuse all of scientific research with the scientific method; it's just one method of investigation.

[muti]

We don't give any credence to untested hypotheses

[f6v]

A theory is usually based on some prior knowledge or observations. But let’s forget that for a second. In the anti-vax case, their argument is: “All your research in favor of vaccinating the population is wrong. We don’t have any evidence for it, but you should turn your public health policy 180 degrees!”. I don’t why it’s so hard to grasp the issue.