[zb1plus]

I really don't see much leadership from C-Level execs at big companies. Frankly, none of them seem to be worth the millions of dollars in compensation they demand. Frankly when you look at Meta's blunders, you can make the case most big tech companies would be better run if they were democratically led with the workers voting on which strategic initiatives to run like a coop.

[hbrn]

> most big tech companies would be better run if they were democratically led with the workers voting on which strategic initiatives to run like a coop

Better for who? Workers? Investors? Users?

For some reason we don't see big tech coops at the size of Meta, yet nothing prevents them from existing. Any chance that it's the nature of coop itself that inhibits growth?