[kleineshertz]

Right. And this is where our paths go separate ways. As I see it, Capillaries users are not necessarily tech companies and they do not have much appetite for writing and maintaining a lot of code. All they want is to run, say, 50 kinds of workflows on a regular basis and to keep those workflow definitions very formalized and stable. It would be hard to sell the idea of maintaining 50 different codebases to their management.

As for more complex calculations: in Capillaries, Python is not a programming platform, it's just a scripting engine.

[lorendsr]

There are definitely ease of use benefits to more tailored solutions. If workflow definitions are really simple and don't change much, JSON might be easy. Most things I prefer the DX of writing the logic in code. And it wouldn't be 50 different codebases—it would usually be a single codebase with 50 different functions.