Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by somebody78978 1129 days ago
> When my girlfriend texts me when I'm out with my AirPods, I think we'd both like me to hear her message in her actual voice rather than Siri's

And then you can use voice to text to text her back, and she can hear it in your voice! It's just like a phone call from 30 years ago, but one that requires infinitely more processing power!
5 comments
elicash 1129 days ago
Genuinely funny reply. But (a) whether I prefer typing or speaking, and (b) whether I prefer reading or hearing, is very context-dependent and might not be the same for the person at the other end -- and so yeah I think having flexibility there is good! If I'm on AirPods and not on my phone, I'd like to hear the message. CarPlay, too. When actively on my phone, I prefer to type, even if on AirPods. CarPlay, I shouldn't probably be typing ever. So yeah, generating text and speech simultaneously and having the end result be situational is in fact a good thing.

It's worth noting this is already how iPhones work and people already love it. What I'm suggesting additionally is substituting Siri's voice for a DIFFERENT customized synthetic voice in a very specific circumstance. I'm not advocating for using synthetic voices where there currently aren't any here.

link
JumpCrisscross 1129 days ago
> It's just like a phone call from 30 years ago, but one that requires infinitely more processing power

There are folks who couldn’t, for a variety of reasons, do that thirty years ago. This feature is for them. The rest of us get to e.g. more naturally text a response to a call we’re listening into on a flight.

link
reaperducer 1129 days ago
Can't you already do that with iMessage's voice delivery feature?
link
JumpCrisscross 1129 days ago
> Can't you already do that with iMessage's voice delivery feature?

Voice memos? No. I would have to, at some point, speak it. If you’re referring to text-to-speech, there is a difference between having your speech read in a different voice and your own.

link
throwaway54_56 1129 days ago
> It's just like a phone call from 30 years ago

Disagree that it's the same at all. Sending discrete messages at your leisure is quite a different experience than a real-time conversation.

link
Someone 1129 days ago
On the plus side it would use less bandwidth. That phone call from 30 years ago probably used (ballpark) 64kilobits/second. This could use a lot less and have higher audio quality.

See it as data compression on the wire.

link
reaperducer 1129 days ago
It's just like a phone call from 30 years ago, but one that requires infinitely more processing power!

And latency!

link