[dmingod666]

Surprised you didn't pick ScyllaDB over cassandra.. ScyllaDB has excellent out of the box support for Golang Change Data Capture and can handle much more load given the same hardware as Cassandra. It has nice integration with stuff like Confluent as well. Given ScyllaDB is mostly drop-in replacment I guess it would be quite straight-forward to swap it out if someone wanted, I guess

[kleineshertz]

ScyllaDB is definitely on the radar. The main reason I picked Cassandra on the prototyping stage was because default Cassandra configuration gave me much better performance then ScyllaDB (I know, it is supposed to be vice versa). Another obvious reason was Cassandra's maturity and community support. If gocqlx is indeed a drop-in replacement for gocql, I can't see problems having a separate config/fork using ScyllaDB along with Cassandra.

[dmingod666]

Yea, gocql works fine.. the CDC on golang is pretty good as well

I asked for support on twitter for some specific load tests, go 2 detailed responses in a day.. only later did I realise, both by the CEO of the company! :D

[MrBuddyCasino]

At this point, I wonder if they should simply have picked a more memorable name. Yes its clever, but even I regularly forget its name. Never happens with Cassandra.