|
|
|
|
|
by Georgelemental
1135 days ago
|
|
> The point is that solid fuel reactors are currently completely fucked from an economic standpoint. They are fundamentally economically noncompetitive. If all of this is so "fundamental", then why does South Korea manage to build plants for cheap? And why has France managed to have its entire grid be nuclear-based for many decades? Please explain. > I want the nuclear industry, nuclear lobby, and American research infrastructure to WAKE UP and start really working on economically viable reactors. Then we must fix the regulatory incentives. That's how capitalism works: corporations chase profit. So if you want them to innovate, you make innovation the profitable option, instead of adding a mountain of regulation to block anything new. |
|
This has a "60% of the time it works every time" feel that seems common when discussing the French grid.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/462535/nuclear-share-ele...
Why didn't they get to 100%, and why do people go out of their way to avoid discussing that?