|
|
|
|
|
by pbhjpbhj
1126 days ago
|
|
Maybe, but 'we can't provide logical rules for names acquired over a millennium ago' seems like a poor reason to say 'therefore we shouldn't apply consistent rules to recent conventions'. Someone asked about physic ... well people used to use physick in [late medieval?] British English... but that's for what we might call medicine now. |
|