[kiawe_fire]

Additionally, I find it a bit concerning that people are ok with violating one principle or right on the basis that it’s fighting against another violation.

If we identify A, B, C, and D as potential rights, and you and I agree on rights A and B, but we disagree on the principles of C and D, then it’s ok that my side violates your rights A and B because if we can’t agree on all of them, then you deserve none.

It’s the kind of thing that ensures that compromise, understanding, and legislation won’t happen by way of conversation or respectful debate, but instead by name calling and force.

[drewcoo]

> people are ok with violating one principle or right on the basis that it’s fighting against another violation

It's as if they never heard of or disagree with the sentiment of the ninth amendment . . .

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-9/