[tivert]

> Now I am curious to ask these "uncensored" models questions that people fight about all day on forums... will everyone suddenly agree that this is the "truth", even if it says something they disagree with? Will they argue that it is impossible to rid them of all bias, and the specific example is indicative of that?

Why would you believe what these models spout is the truth at all? They're not some magic godlike sci-fi AI. Ignoring the alignment issue, they'll hallucinate falsehoods.

Anyone who agrees to take whatever the model spits out as "truth" is too stupid to be listened to.

[status200]

Apologies for not being clear, "truth" might be too triggering of a word these days, but the models will need some level of objective accuracy to be useful, and it would be interesting to see where the "uncensored" models fall on that accuracy metric, and how people react to what information it displays once the guard rails are off.