|
|
|
|
|
by zdragnar
1126 days ago
|
|
I can't imagine what kind of liability insurance would be needed for a GPT solution aimed at such heavily regulated fields as law, medicine or finance. You can add all the caveats you want, but I suspect ml chat is stuck in the uncanny valley of not good enough to be trusted and not bad enough to be a toy. |
|
https://twitter.com/ai__pub/status/1644735555752853504
https://www.lawnext.com/2023/04/harvey-ai-raises-21m-in-a-se...
Microsoft plans for Medicine
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/04/gpt-4...
GPT-4 is more than good enough. People have no idea what's coming. There just needs some sort of supervision or oversight (and right now, it'll work with rather than completely replace practitioners).