[adgjlsfhk1]

It's not 0.85 per file. It's 0.85 for the 50k files combined.

[shakow]

No, because the program has to be run by slurm over several compute nodes, so it can't process them all at once.

[adgjlsfhk1]

as long as you don't have 50k computers, it still should be 0.85 seconds per node which is still tiny.

[shakow]

> it still should be 0.85 seconds per node

No it's not, because I will not architecture my whole pipeline & program around Julia inability to start in maybe a second in a year or 1.7" now, I will just use another language.

[pjmlp]

In good company, that is what Python folks do all the time.

[shakow]

Python does not take 1.7" to load pandas.

[pjmlp]

> I will just use another language.

Hello C, C++ and Fortran.