[easytiger]

If anything your rephrasing shows the patent absurdity.

> 1. CA would be taking the money from everyone.

Take money from everyone -> give to a subset of people == subset of people not reimbursed are net shouldering the cost.

> 2. The people who would receive the money are descendants of slaves; while not former slaves themselves, this $ could be thought of as a representation of the inheritance they should have received.

The asumption there is that skin colour ispo facto defines that you missed out on an "inheritance". Certainly previous discussion didn't define proof of lineage. The inverse is that other skin colours ispo facto have some financial benefit. Which would make all white people wealthy. Which isn't true.

The bit you also fail to discuss is the reality. These policies based on reductive marxist ideology, flawed since it's formalisation. Designed specifically to generate false predicates of victim-hood so as to take money and assets from other people. It is i'm afraid that simple