|
> There may be people with a bad case of it, I assume it's on a spectrum like many personality traits, but the term is heavily overused. > I see it mainly used when someone doesn't agree with the other person's line of reasoning. I agree, but that's not what you said. What you said was "And we're all narcissists... that's nature. It's such a pointless and empty statement", declaring that narcissism, as a category, doesn't exist. > Just right now, my denial of it nearly had you diagnosing me with it. I did not "diagnose" you with it because you disagree with me. The reason I said it's a possibility is because you said that narcissism doesn't exist and that everybody's a narcissist. Depressed people think everyone is depressed, paranoid people think their paranoia is just normal skepticism. Our human mind projects a lot of our own qualities onto others. From your denial of existence of narcissism, I could only conclude that you either don't have a precise representation of narcissism in your mind, or that you do have a precise representation of narcissism but project it onto others as a self-defense mechanism. If my assessment is not true, please tell me what could the third reason be - why else would someone deny existence of narcissism? But, we see now that you don't think that narcissism isn't real, only that Trump is just a little bit narcissistic, so this whole comment is pointless. |
Do you believe it's binary or a spectrum?
At what point do you think people "cross over" to meet a threshold of being a "narcissist"?