Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tonyhb 1139 days ago
Ah, unbalanced shards via wrong sharding keys was an issue at one point, IIRC. I remember talking with an SRE there when something bad happened at GitHub last year, and I know that this time the current DB cluster failed.

To be clear, I _was_ mapping previous incidents with this year's incident — no competitor or hard feelings involved. I really like Vitess, fwiw. And the only thing I really love is FoundationDB :)
1 comments
samlambert 1139 days ago
That wasn't clear.

Side note: "Autosharding" is largely a myth that unproven databases are touting. Sharding is complex and requires planning and control. Databases that start shuffling data round without oversight produce nasty surprises. Trying to be too magic is normally always a mistake with databases.

link
tonyhb 1139 days ago
Yeah, fair, totally get it. Wasn't aiming to spread FUD, and I know that FDB is a little hard to compare against... it is pretty magic with how it routes and shards :D (https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/keyspace-partitions-perfor...)
link
tonyhb 1134 days ago
For posterity: https://github.blog/2023-05-16-addressing-githubs-recent-ava...

It was the DB, and it was rogue usage on May 10, so I'm standing by my original comment

link