Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by famouswaffles 1130 days ago
Not really. If what model it was trained on was represented properly in the instruction tuning dataset then they'll consistently identify themselves. But it's not a given that that was the case for bard.
1 comments

It seems that Bard's version is only specified in the prompt, and it doesn't have a strong sense of identity. For me it's pretty reliable:

1. ask it what PaLM 2 is (to pollute the context) 2. ask it whether it's based on PaLM 2 (it will tell you - yes, sure)