[cjalmeida]

Cult? That's a very bad take. It's a tool, great for some stuff, rough edges here and there.

People invest huge amount of effort fixing Python's shortcomings (pyspark, tf, jax, mojo) requiring a completely different way of thinking modulo the syntax. And nobody is talking about the "cult of the snake"

[cookieperson]

It's not culty to make packages for a language. It is culty to work 12 hrs a day to appease Julia computing for free to have your work taken renamed and offered to the community with different names on the authors list.

[cjalmeida]

This is a bold statement. Can you provide references?

[cookieperson]

Sure graphs.jl used to be lightgraphs.jl. rumor has it the author was bullied out of the community for their personal beliefs which had nothing to do with graphs or programming. Then the Julia crew took the project and sunset the lightgraphs guys work. There are other cases of stuff like this happening but I'm too lazy. Just go ahead spend a few years in the community contributing, good times ahead. Keep in mind, if you aren't paying for the product you are the product.