|
|
|
|
|
by TheRealPomax
1138 days ago
|
|
Why is this genius? It's just the NN equivalent of making a new programming language and getting it to the point where its compiler can be written in itself. The reliability question is of course the main issue. If you don't know how the system works, you can't assign a trust value to anything it comes up with, even if it seems like what it comes up with makes sense. |
|
It seems NN output could be trusted in scenarios where a test exists. For example: "ChatGPT design a house using [APP] and make sure the compiled plans comply with structural/electrical/design/etc codes for area [X]".
But how is any information that isn't testable trusted? I'm open to the idea ChatGPT is as credible as experts in the dismal sciences given that information cannot be proven or falsified and legitimacy is assigned by stringing together words that "makes sense".