|
|
|
|
|
by stonogo
1143 days ago
|
|
My memory of 2001 was that CSS1 was a real contender, and CSS2 was beginning to take shape. CSS2-style class and type selectors were already strongly supported; see https://web.archive.org/web/20030803081721/http://devedge.ne... CSS was still a short time away from any one browser fully supporting it, but already the table purists were trying to chase developers away to <div>. |
|
CSS2 was capable of supplanting tables for many layout tasks, but its implementation (especially with respect to layout) was so haphazardly inconsistent across different browsers that most devs did not utilize its new features until browsers consistently supported them, which wasn't until Internet Explorer 6 achieved >95% marketshare in 2002 and devs "standardized" on its CSS2 implementation. The earliest I remember hearing debates on tables vs. CSS was circa 2003/2004.
In 2001, a more plausible argument would be over whether it's a good idea to implement a site completely in Macromedia Flash, and whether that was the future of web development. There were some pretty astounding Flash websites back then, e.g.
https://www.malandarras.com/2advanced
https://www.webdesignmuseum.org/exhibitions/2advanced-studio...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHbQmqmmIFk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWkNkQoQY_8
Indeed, 2advanced was notorious for throwing huge warehouse raves, during which the CEO would DJ. Sounds like something ripped straight from the pages of Bleeding Edge.