|
|
|
|
|
by breck
1137 days ago
|
|
I like it. My feedback would be a simpler approach, ditching the hash. Why not just encourage people to put their email address in plain text in a DNS record? If they want anonymity, they can fall back to the way verification is done today. If they want convenience, they can broadcast their email&DNS link. For example, I own "BreckYunits.com" and my email address is listed throughout my site. I wouldn't be giving up any privacy by putting that in a DNS record. Sure, some people will exaggerate the fear risk (usually the ones selling a security product), but I'm of the old school opinion that we should advocate good behavior and admonish bad behavior on the web and build a more civil world. |
|
My reading is that it's because the purpose of the effort is to compel Google, Facebook, etc. license this proprietary protocol from the creator. I don't personally understand what the moat is since DNS- or file-based verification is a basic feature of all services that need to validate domain control.