[mindvirus]

Managed to load the PDF. It seems to be pretty scattershot, basically a collection of every complaint we've all heard about AI. Not a lawyer but key complaints seem to be:

* Despite OpenAI’s mission to ‘benefit all of humanity in a broad and distributed manner,’ early stakeholders that are part of the YC network or bought in are now getting commercially invaluable early access to these systems.

* These GPTs have been trained on large datasets that belong to the commons; text, images, and video freely available across the internet. This free data is typically only used for research purposes under Fair Use law. No compensation has been offered to anyone who created this data. Much of it is copyrighted.

* The blitzscaling of OpenAI is problematic and illegal in a number of ways (Fraud, Breach of Trust and Fiduciary Duties, Legal Disruption, Copyright infringement, etc, etc, etc)

* Demonstrates bias against Trump and not Biden.

[zdragnar]

I don't know how many are genuine, but the examples I've seen of different responses to prompts with either Trump or Biden as the subject have been pretty wild.

I've personally seen a few blind spots / biases in non-political topics as well, but had previously written them off as merely incomplete training data. Lately, though, I've been pondering how many accidental biases have crept in and to what extent that will shape how people work when they're assuming they are getting an unbiased answer.

[brookst]

That last bullet explains the whole thing.

Suddenly conservatives are worried about the legitimacy of nonprofits, and uninterested in free speech for corporations. Shocking.