|
|
|
|
|
by jexp
1134 days ago
|
|
The article is factually incorrect on many fronts. There were only 3 reactors running at last. Nuclear was never profitable, the country shouldered most of its costs (esp for radioactive waste storage) The renewable energy transition was blocked and delayed by the same Merkel govt. Germany was once leading in wind and PV energy and all those industries were destroyed and almost 100k jobs lost. 60bn subsidies per year go to fossil fuel companies including coal mining and burning. Often under the disguise of job retention. All through industrial lobbying and strong unions in the fossil fuel industries. |
|
It is hard to argue about energy cost in Germany, because all energy sources are a mixture of privately financed and public/state-subsidized, but always in different, complicated and frankly weird ways. Things are easier to see in countries where either practically everything is done by the state (e.g. France) or everything is more free-market (e.g. the US).