|
|
|
|
|
by agentultra
1141 days ago
|
|
Right so Bing is going to decide it doesn’t want to answer your queries anymore because you left a rude comment to someone they’re friends with on Reddit some day? That’s what makes my day: AGI folks have to rely on myth-making and speculation. The here and now incarnation of GPT-4 is what it is. I’m not saying it isn’t useful, powerful, or interesting. I’m saying that needless speculation isn’t helping to inform people of the real dangers that such proselytizing is causing. |
|
But there's speculation of the fantasy sort, and then there's speculation of the well-grounded "this conclusion follows from that one" sort, and the AGI folks seem to be mostly in the second camp.
And yeah, unlike GPT-4, AGI isn't here-and-now. But GPT-2 was an amusing toy in 2019, and GPT-3 was an intriguing curiosity in 2020. In 2014, "computers [didn't] stand a chance against humans" at Go[2], but two years later, it was humans who no longer stood a chance against computers. The here-and-now is changing fast these days. Don't you think it's worth looking even a little bit up the road ahead?
Isn't there some role here for speculation?
[1] https://www.vice.com/en/article/kbzd3a/the-new-york-times-19...
[2] https://www.wired.com/2014/05/the-world-of-computer-go/