Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by noud 1140 days ago
ChatGPT4 blew my mind when I asked it some specific details about my PhD thesis. It was a relative simple question, but you needed to know some domain knowledge to give the correct answer. ChatGPT not only gave a wrong answer, it completely made up a story was beyond repair. It is concerning (blew my mind) how confident ChatGPT can provide a completely wrong answer.
4 comments

A recent thesis is a single datapoint at the edge of human knowledge. These bots will necessarily be better at parsing information with more interconnectedness closer to the core of existing human knowledge.
Have you pasted (parts of) your thesis as context?
Interestingly, I asked about my field of research it just outputed a combination of the two open-access review papers for the field.

It was nothing special, nor not completely correct, but it is the first time I've been able to pinpoint ChatGPTs source.

GPT4 seems to do a better job with not making up references than GPT3.5. Don't check the DOIs though
Are those references just relevant sources, or actual citations?

For my example I knew of the sources already. ChatGPT didn't make the connection

Sometimes either just relevant or actual citations, I've seen both. If you ask for specific citations for a specific phrase it's basically a coin flip what you get, what you get could be fake citations
Was it GPT-4 or ChatGPT?
What's the difference? Doesn't ChatGPT uses GTP-4?
Currently, by default, it uses 3.5. Premium allows you to switch to 4, but it's rather limited (25 messages every 3 hours or so).
Ok, so by "ChatGPT" parent means "ChatGPT using GPT-3.5"