|
|
|
|
|
by dragontamer
1142 days ago
|
|
I blame WSB for making up bullshit stories about FRC going to $50 when FRC was clearly collapsing in reality. It's the same pattern. Meme a lie really really hard, then screw over the community by taking money from the people who believes the lie. No different from the GME price target of $1000 or any of the others WSB lies that people have fallen for. It's just a means to extract money from sheeple. ------ It's all the same pattern. My question is how many times do the WSB Redditors have to get screwed over before they notice they are the marks getting played. I don't blame retail for getting so blatantly manipulated. Everyone knows they're dumb money who will easily believe these lies. I blame WSB leaders and moderators for so plainly taking advantage of retail investors and doing so for years. |
|
There is a huge disconnect between people throwing out price targets and a pump and dump, I don't think that I need to spell that out. One is over-enthusiasm, the other is crime.
For what it's worth, FRC was incredibly tradeable very early on in the beginning of the banking crisis, regularly doing very large swings. Though, what I believe you're talking about is the expectation the FRC would exceed expectations on earnings and would go on to return to its pre-crisis prices. This is not a pump and dump and makes sense. If the bank is no longer in trouble then you'd expect normality to resume. This did not turn out to be the case and it ended up being taken over by JPM. This is not a pump and dump in any way.
The price targets of $1000 for GME would have been met should they not have disabled the buy button but I believe that there would have been a really strong sell off at the upper $900s which would have had a big impact on the price and I'm not sure it would've recovered. Please see TSLA as a stock which has gained a huge market cap as a result of enthusiastic investors.