|
|
|
|
|
by dragonwriter
1143 days ago
|
|
Most pump and dump schemes present themselves as intelligence/analysis; there is no content-based objective differentiation, just intent and good-faith. But, actually, some of the WSB stuff is openly coordinated strategy, not intelligence, overtly seeking to manipulate enough action to cause an outcome, not providing intelligence/analysis on what os likely to occur without active intervention |
|
> But, actually, some of the WSB stuff is openly coordinated strategy, not intelligence, overtly seeking to manipulate enough action to cause an outcome, not providing intelligence/analysis on what os likely to occur without active intervention
That would not be correct, no. If you're talking about trying to trigger a short squeeze then that is mechanically different from a pump and dump.
A short squeeze does not require the participants to raise the price, it requires a restriction of the publicly available float in order to trap "shorts" and then, when their options expire and they must purchase the shares to satisfy the contract, it creates a massive demand for shares on what is now an illiquid stock and this results in the price rising.
There have been many occasions when they have tried to squeeze a stock but I have not seen one where they have tried to attempt a pump and dump.