|
|
|
|
|
by mbreese
1139 days ago
|
|
Not for me. I mean, it “works” as in it is a functioning computer, but it’s not really useful as a daily driver machine. Mine is very touchy and build quality-wise, it’s not great. It is great for what you pay, don’t get me wrong. And I’m sure some people could use it daily, but between the battery life and sluggish performance, it’s not really in the same conversation as the Framework model here. I think for me the real issue I have is that with the Pinebook Pro (and Linux on ARM in general), you’re limited to a specific set of “blessed” Linux distributions. There is still a lot of custom code that goes into these, so it’s not at the point of being able to just download your favorite distro and running it. It’s getting better, but there are so many variations of chips that it’s hard to get things running smoothly. The flexibility of the OS and ARM CPUs really makes it difficult without a major OEM/vendor taking charge. |
|
Their modus operandi is to take reference circuits, splatter on a few peripherals to IO lines, make a case, and call it a day.
Happen to have 2 USB-C ports (ala pinephone pro)? Hope you which one to use cause the other one will fry stuff.
You have a pine SBC? Says it will boot on their micro memory chips instead of mSD? Nah you still need a mSD to pass to the chip.
And they'll wash their hands of any support requests, and blame the open source community for support.
Save yourself the pain, suffering, and lost money. Do not buy Pine anything.