Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by halJordan 1148 days ago
It's because tpms are small and have small storage. The outrageous "its a secret cabal" voices are a prime example of what people cook up when faced with something they cant explain due to ignorance but feel the need to have an answer. Its as outrageous as a Republican saying "Q did it."
3 comments

Wondering if something was requested by law enforcement isn't implying a cabal, chill.

Also a couple kilobytes of flash costs basically nothing. And you could hash keys over a certain length, which is much better than having such a short limit on a human-typed string.

A couple of kilobytes of flash also doesn't come with the protections the tpm offers (or at least is supposed to offer, considering the article in the OP)
Sure they are small little embedded chips, supposedly physically hardened from tampering.

but argon2($string_of_any_length) should produce a fixed-length byte string, no?

And if they aren't using such a password library, what other errors are likely?

Timing attack on the character of the pw which failed?

If you'd like to provide schemata, open standards and source code for them, then don't keep the class waiting.

Don't/can't? Then you're a fool trusting someone else to do something you yourself cannot inspect. Then again, most people seem to be oddly fine with that. I am not of that number.

as a 1337 pwn3r the TPMs are fine

source: just trust me bro